Insurance Agencies Leaving California as Wildfire Rates Increase
Two prominent players in the insurance industry have withdrawn their involvement in California’s home insurance market due to the escalating wildfire risk and surging construction expenses in the most populous state of the nation. Now, homeowners in the area are facing rising rates from the remaining companies and a tougher time finding adequate insurance for their properties. As this trend continues, it will become increasingly difficult for residents of California to receive financial compensation when a wildfire damages their homes.
Two Prominent Insurance Agencies Announce Changes in California
Recently, State Farm made the announcement that it would no longer accept applications for property and casualty insurance, encompassing both business and personal lines. They cited reasons like inflation, challenges in the reinsurance market, and a rapidly expanding exposure to catastrophic events, specifically wildfires. State Farm emphasized its commitment to risk management and the necessity of these actions to enhance the company’s financial stability.
Meanwhile, Allstate, another major insurance firm, had previously disclosed in November that it would temporarily halt the issuance of new policies for homeowners, condos, and commercial properties in California to safeguard existing policyholders. In a statement, Allstate said, “The cost to insure new home customers in California is far higher than the price they would pay for policies due to wildfires, higher costs for repairing homes, and higher reinsurance premiums.”
Insurance Agencies Mitigate Risk Across the Country
This development in California’s insurance landscape reflects a broader trend seen across the nation, where companies are either raising insurance premiums, restricting coverage, or completely withdrawing from areas vulnerable to wildfires and other natural disasters, all in the context of a changing climate. States like Florida and Louisiana have faced challenges in maintaining robust insurance markets following extensive hurricane damage, while Colorado has witnessed premium increases due to the threat of wildfires. Additionally, an effort in Oregon to assess wildfire risk through mapping was rejected last year due to concerns that it might cause premiums to soar.
The Increasing Risk of Wildfires
Scientists assert that climate change has led to warmer and drier conditions in the Western United States over the past three decades, contributing to more extreme weather events and a higher frequency of devastating wildfires. In recent years, California has borne witness to the largest and most destructive wildfires in its history.
One prominent example is the Mosquito Wildfire that took place in September 2022. According to Matt Huffman, a Mosquito Wildfire lawyer, “The fire consumed around 120 square miles of land, destroying 78 buildings and damaging 13 others.” Residents in El Corado, Volcanoville, Bald Mountain, Quintette, Grey Eagle, and Canyon Creek were all forced to evacuate their homes, along with many others from the surrounding areas.
Homeowners Struggle to Find Adequate Protection
As a result of these developments, some Californian homeowners are already finding it challenging to secure insurance coverage. The shortage of new policies may further complicate the home-buying process in the state. The state-operated insurance pool, which serves as a last-resort insurer for many, could face increased pressure as enrollments surge. This insurance pool provides basic fire insurance coverage for properties in high-risk areas. It’s seen a large increase in enrollment in recent years, reaching more than 270,000 homes in 2022. However, according to data compiled by the Insurance Information Institute, there are more than 1.2 million homes at risk of extreme wildfires in California.
In a statement, the Institute said “The number of acres burned in California has grown steadily in recent years, as more people are moving into fire-prone areas of the state. More homes in harm’s way — combined with rising costs of repairing or replacing houses either damaged or lost to fire — leads to increased insured losses.”
The Future of Home Insurance in California
If the large insurance providers continue to limit their policies in California or leave the state altogether, California may need to loosen restrictions that benefit consumers to entice the insurance providers back. For example, California voters approved Proposition 103 in 1988, which allowed the state insurance commission to reject suggested rate increases. This law has likely saved consumers in California billions of dollars since it was implemented.
For now, there are still more than 100 companies providing residential home insurance in California. Consumers can therefore continue to get home insurance. However, some of these companies only over limited lines of coverage and may not insure a property against wildfire damage. In addition, smaller insurance agencies often have to charge higher rates in order to mitigate their risk. And, if other large insurance agencies decide to leave the state, consumers will have a diminishing list of choices.