What Is Stacked Uninsured Motorist Coverage?

Sometimes road accidents happen and you’re not the one at fault. Regardless, the damage has been done, and it needs to be paid for.

If the other person is at fault, naturally their liability coverage will cover for your medical and car damage. But what if they don’t have insurance? Or what if it was a hit-and-run case and you’re the one badly affected by it. What about such expenses?

Well, not everything needs to be paid out of your pocket. Uninsured motorist coverage helps you if that’s the case.

What is Uninsured Motorist Coverage?

Just an add-on feature to your existing auto insurance policy, uninsured motorist coverage pays for the damages you bear if the other driver is uninsured and is at fault. Even though the amount is only a little bit to add to the policy, it could be beneficial in unforeseen circumstances.

Every US driver must have auto insurance because it is illegal to drive even a yard without insurance. Still, some people don’t have a valid auto insurance policy. So there is a chance that you encounter an uninsured driver in an accident.

The uninsured motorist coverage will cover your medical expenses as well as the damage is done to your car, and this could ease down on your financial burden.

What is Stacked Uninsured Motorist Coverage?

Stacked uninsured motorist coverage is an option that lets you increase your motorist coverage or ‘stack’ up uninsured and underinsured coverage to have a greater total.

Underinsured motorist coverage is when you’re in an accident with an insured driver who is also at fault. Still, his insurance capacity isn’t enough to cover for all of your expenses. That is when stacking helps you!

Stacking within one policy

If your insurance company allows you to stack the coverage amount of two cars under one policy, it could be an excellent option for you. For instance, you have an uninsured motorist coverage of $400,000 on each vehicle, if you get into an accident, you could double or ‘stack’ it up to a total coverage amount of $800,000.

Stacking on multiple policies

If you have two different policies for two other cars, you can add both coverages amounts to have a fair lump sum amount of total coverage.

If in one policy you have $20,000 coverage and $30,000 coverage in the other policy, the insurance company could pay a collision with an uninsured driver of $50,000 which could save you a lot of money.

States that allow Insurance Stacking

It is important to note that all states might not allow insurance stacking, and even if they do, your insurance company might not.

According to American Property Casualty Insurance Association, here are the state laws about insurance stacking.

State Stacking with multiple policies? Stacking within one policy?
Alabama Yes. If there are separate policies, there is no stacking limitation. Yes, up to three vehicles.
Alaska No No
Arizona No No
Arkansas Yes, unless policy unambiguously disallows. Yes, unless policy unambiguously disallows.
California No No
Colorado Yes Yes; however, anti-stacking provisions are allowed. A single policy or endorsement for UM or UIM coverage issued for a single premium covering multiple vehicles may be limited to applying once per accident.
Connecticut No No
Delaware Yes No; however, when two or more vehicles are insured under one policy, the limits of liability apply separately to each vehicle, but the recovery must not exceed the highest limit of liability under any one vehicle.
District of Columbia No, so long as policy language is clear. No, so long as policy language is clear.
Florida Yes, unless waived in writing on state-approved form. Yes, unless waived in writing on state-approved form.
Georgia Yes No
Hawaii No Yes; insurers must offer insured options to purchase stacking; stacking of fleet vehicles not allowed.
Idaho No, if policy language clearly and unambiguously prohibits stacking. No, if policy language clearly and unambiguously prohibits stacking.
Illinois No. Anti-stacking clause is enforceable if unambiguous and not in violation of public policy. No, when anti-stacking provision is clear and unambiguous.
Indiana No, unless policy language is ambiguous. Yes, if a separate and specific premium is charged for UM coverage and policy is ambiguous. If policy language is clear and unambiguous, the stacking of coverages under a single policy is not permitted.
Iowa No; however, if more than one policy or coverage applies to an accident, insured may choose to apply coverage with the highest limits. No, if policy language is clear.
Kansas No No
Kentucky Yes, if a separate premium is charged for each vehicle. Yes, if a single premium is paid.
Louisiana No No
Maine No, unless anti-stacking language is ambiguous. No, unless anti-stacking language is ambiguous.
Maryland No No, if policy language is clear and unambiguous.
Massachusetts No No
Michigan No No
Minnesota No No
Mississippi Yes Yes
Missouri Yes Yes
Montana Yes Yes
Nebraska No No
Nevada Yes Yes
New Hampshire Yes, whenever policy terms are ambiguous. Yes, unless policy prohibits stacking through clear and unambiguous policy language.
New Jersey Yes No
New Mexico Yes, but injured people not in the policyholder’s household may not stack. Yes; however, a policy containing anti-stacking language must be “truly unambiguous” and specify a single premium for single coverage.
New York Yes No
North Carolina Yes No
North Dakota No No
Ohio Yes; unless clearly excluded by policy. Yes; unless clearly excluded by policy.
Oklahoma Yes, unless policy contained a clause excluding multiple recoveries and only one premium for UM coverage was paid. No, if policy language is clear.
Oregon Yes; anti-stacking clauses are unenforceable. No
Pennsylvania Yes Yes, but only members of the policyholder’s household can stack.
Rhode Island Yes, if insured pays separate premiums. Yes, if insured pays separate premiums.
South Carolina Yes, limited stacking is permitted. Yes, unless policy includes an anti-stacking clause.
South Dakota No No
Tennessee No No
Texas Yes No
Utah Yes for UM; no for UIM No
Vermont Yes, where the insured has paid separate premiums. Yes; unless policy clearly and unambiguously precludes stacking.
Virginia Yes; unless policy contains clear and unambiguous language prohibiting stacking. No; if an anti-stacking language is clear.
Washington No, if anti-stacking language is clear. No
West Virginia Yes Yes, but anti-stacking provisions allowed.
Wisconsin Yes, but anti-stacking language is permitted. Yes, but anti-stacking language is permitted.
Wyoming Yes No; so long as anti-stacking language is clear.

What is the rejection of Stacked Uninsured Coverage Limits?

In simple words, the rejection of stacked uninsured coverage limits is the insurance company rejecting the claim of you adding two coverages for one reason. This would mean that each range will be treated and claimed separately.

How much Uninsured Motorist Coverage do I need?

For the states that have uninsured motorist coverage, the minimum amount is $25,000 for bodily injury and $50,000 per accident. But according to each person, they can choose how much coverage they want from the policy.

Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage options are simply add-ons to your existing auto insurance policy, to stay ahead of the chance of you being hit by an uninsured driver. In this scenario, insurance companies pay the uninsured person’s damages they caused you when they were at fault.

Stacking these insurance policies means to add both uninsured and underinsured coverages to have a more significant amount paid for the damage and medical bills. Some states might not legally allow it, but some may. So it is always better to keep searching for state laws and what they say about stacking uninsured motorist coverage. And if one insurance company rejects the option of stacking, you can always look for another company.

Sandra Johnson

Sandra Johnson

Sandra Johnson was a few years out of school and took a job as a life insurance agent in California, selling coverage door-to-door for Prudential. The experience taught her about the technical components of insurance and its benefits for individuals and society, as well as the misunderstandings people often have about insurance. She has over ten years’ experience in the insurance industry, having worked as both a Broker and Underwriter, assisting clients across a broad range of industries. At Insurance Noon, Sarah diligently gathers all the required information and curates up pieces to provide meaningful insurance solutions. Her personal value proposition is to demonstrate a genuine interest in always adding value for clients.Her determined approach to guiding clients has turned her into a platinum adviser to multiple insurers.

Insurance Noon is the world's leading source of insurance related content on the web, focusing on industry news, buying guides, reviews, and much more.